<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>a Single Point of Contact &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aspoc.net/archives/category/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aspoc.net</link>
	<description>a technical blog, by Matt Wade</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:44:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Forefront for OCS error on the Access Edge (Event ID: 10161 &amp; 10162)</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2009/10/05/forefront-for-ocs-error-on-the-access-edge-event-id-10161-10162-2/</link>
		<comments>http://aspoc.net/archives/2009/10/05/forefront-for-ocs-error-on-the-access-edge-event-id-10161-10162-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2007R2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/archives/2009/10/05/forefront-for-ocs-error-on-the-access-edge-event-id-10161-10162-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Symptoms The IM Notification Agent on the Access Edge is failing with the following Application Log events: Event ID: 10162 Type: Error Source: ForefrontNotificationAgent Description: &#8220;ERROR: Microsoft.FSO.IMClient.dll.IMClient.RaiseLoginDone(&#8220;&#60;System.Boolean success&#62;&#60;System.String message&#62;&#8221;) &#8211; Error occured logging in to server: 80072746: .&#8221; AND Event ID: 10161 Type: Error Source: ForefrontNotificationAgent Description: &#8220;ERROR: ForefrontNotificationAgent.exe.NotificationAgent.imClient_LoginDone(&#8220;&#60;System.Object sender&#62;&#60;FSOIMClient.ReportSuccessEventArgs e&#62;&#8221;) &#8211; Failed to login.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><h3>Symptoms</h3>
<p>The IM Notification Agent on the Access Edge is failing with the following Application Log events:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Event ID: 10162<br />
Type: Error<br />
Source: ForefrontNotificationAgent<br />
Description:<br />
&#8220;ERROR: Microsoft.FSO.IMClient.dll.IMClient.RaiseLoginDone(&#8220;&lt;System.Boolean success&gt;&lt;System.String message&gt;&#8221;) &#8211; Error occured logging in to server: 80072746: .&#8221;</p>
<p><em>AND</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Event ID: 10161<br />
Type: Error<br />
Source: ForefrontNotificationAgent<br />
Description:<br />
&#8220;ERROR: ForefrontNotificationAgent.exe.NotificationAgent.imClient_LoginDone(&#8220;&lt;System.Object sender&gt;&lt;FSOIMClient.ReportSuccessEventArgs e&gt;&#8221;) &#8211; Failed to login.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-625"></span> </p>
<h3>More information</h3>
<p>You have correctly setup the IM Notification Agent account per the instructions found <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc676975.aspx" target="_blank">here</a> on TechNet for an Access Edge server.  You have verified the notification account id and password are accurate by logging in with the notification account from a remote client. Your IM Notification Agent settings look as follows:</p>
<h6>IM Notification Agent settings</h6>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Use ForefrontRTCProxy Service Credentials: Unchecked<br />
Transport: TLS<br />
</em><em></em><em>Username: domain\userid<br />
</em><em></em><em>Password: *****<br />
</em><em></em><em>SIP URI: sip:userid@company.com<br />
</em><em></em><em>Home or Pool Server</em><em>: Director FQDN</em></p>
<p>SIP Logging on the director server shows a “<strong>SIP/2.0 301 Redirect request to Home Server” </strong>message with no response from the home pool.  This tells us that the Director server is treating the Forefront Notification Agent as an inside client and thus is trying to redirect the “client” to the notification account’s home pool.  The Director server should <em>proxy</em> the request, not <em>redirect</em>.  Remote user connections cannot be redirected.  Read <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/ucedsg/archive/2009/05/18/do-i-need-a-director-with-ocs-r2.aspx" target="_blank">here</a> for more information on how a director behaves with internal vs. external clients. Changing the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Home or Pool server</span> settings to point to the notification account’s home pool FQDN does not solve the problem.</p>
<h3>Resolution</h3>
<h5>Option 1</h5>
<p>In the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Home or Pool Server</span> field add the FQDN entry for Access Edge external interface (sip.company.com).  However just changing the entry is not enough, you’ll also want to specify the port as follows “<strong>sip.company.com:443”</strong>.  This is of course assuming that your AE external interface FQDN is sip.company.com.  Make sure the Access Edge server correctly identifies the external FQDN to the correct IP address.  Changing to the AE FQDN will route the Forefront Notification Agent login request through the Access Edge service and then to the next hop server (Director).  The Director will then properly process the login request as a remote client.</p>
<p>Further SIP logging on the Director reveals a successful “<strong>Routed a request on behalf of an application” </strong>followed by a successful response from the account’s home pool.</p>
<h6>IM Notification Agent settings</h6>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Use ForefrontRTCProxy Service Credentials: Unchecked<br />
</em><em>Transport: TLS<br />
</em><em>Username: domain\userid<br />
</em><em>Password: *****<br />
</em><em>SIP URI: sip:userid@company.com<br />
</em><em>Home or Pool Server: sip.company.com:443</em></p>
<h5>Option 2</h5>
<p>Another recent fix that was brought to my attention was to enter the SIP URI without the “sip:” prefix.  Your settings would be as follows:</p>
<h6>IM Notification Agent settings</h6>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Use ForefrontRTCProxy Service Credentials: Unchecked<br />
</em><em>Transport: TLS<br />
</em><em>Username: domain\userid<br />
</em><em>Password: *****<br />
</em><em>SIP URI: <strong>userid</strong>@company.com (without sip: prefix)<br />
</em><em>Home or Pool Server: sip.company.com:443</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<h3>Cause</h3>
<p>As for the cause, I cannot speak to what is specifically causing this issue as I feel this is either a bug in the Forefront notification agent OR an error in the documentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aspoc.net/archives/2009/10/05/forefront-for-ocs-error-on-the-access-edge-event-id-10161-10162-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Server 2008 Security Guide Now Available!</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/03/21/windows-server-2008-security-guide-now-available/</link>
		<comments>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/03/21/windows-server-2008-security-guide-now-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/03/21/windows-server-2008-security-guide-now-available/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read the post from the Windows Security team to get some information on the new guide&#8230; http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc264463.aspx]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://blogs.technet.com/secguide/archive/2008/03/21/windows-server-2008-security-guide-now-available.aspx">Read the post from the Windows Security team to get some information on the new guide&#8230;</a></p>
<p><a title="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc264463.aspx" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc264463.aspx">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc264463.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/03/21/windows-server-2008-security-guide-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No more &quot;power users&quot;</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/02/12/no-more-power-users/</link>
		<comments>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/02/12/no-more-power-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/02/12/no-more-power-users/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Riley elaborates on some of the new security features in Vista that eliminate the need for the &#34;power users&#34; security group.&#160; In fact, &#34;power users&#34; in Vista is there only for backwards compatibility. Excerpt: &#34;I&#8217;ve seen some conversations lately about the Power Users group &#8212; how powerful is it, really, and why did we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://blogs.technet.com/steriley/">Steve Riley</a> elaborates on some of the new security features in Vista that eliminate the need for the &quot;power users&quot; security group.&#160; In fact, &quot;power users&quot; in Vista is there only for backwards compatibility. </p>
<p>Excerpt:</p>
<p>&quot;I&#8217;ve seen some conversations lately about the Power Users group &#8212; how powerful is it, really, and why did we remove the group from Windows Vista?&quot;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.technet.com/steriley/archive/2008/02/11/plan-now-to-eliminate-power-users-from-your-domains.aspx">Read the rest of Steve&#8217;s post here&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/02/12/no-more-power-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: Network Access Protection (NAP) documents from MS</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/02/04/update-network-access-protection-documents-from-ms/</link>
		<comments>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/02/04/update-network-access-protection-documents-from-ms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/02/04/update-network-access-protection-documents-from-ms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MS recently updated three documents covering NAP (Network Access Protection).  Good reference materials for your ever growing library. Introduction to Network Access Protection Network Access Protection Policies in Windows Server 2008 Network Access Protection Platform Architecture]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>MS recently updated three documents covering NAP (Network Access Protection).  Good reference materials for your ever growing library.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=5d5e243a-23a8-479c-9f2d-37d6d79153e7&amp;displaylang=en&amp;tm">Introduction to Network Access Protection</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=8e47649e-962c-42f8-9e6f-21c5ccdcf490&amp;displaylang=en&amp;tm">Network Access Protection Policies in Windows Server 2008</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=2f37651e-1749-45c3-996e-53de05d44ef7&amp;displaylang=en&amp;tm">Network Access Protection Platform Architecture</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/02/04/update-network-access-protection-documents-from-ms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FaxBox: the latest in password scams</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/01/07/faxbox-the-latest-in-password-scams/</link>
		<comments>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/01/07/faxbox-the-latest-in-password-scams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/01/07/faxbox-the-latest-in-password-scams/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My favorite security guru, Mr. Steve Riley posted another good article on a new scam that may find it&#8217;s way into your mailbox soon.&#160; Be prepared now&#8230; &#160; Excerpt: &#160; &#8220;Looks like spammers have found yet another way to worm (ha ha) themselves into the computers of the unsuspecting. In my junk email folder this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>My favorite security guru, Mr. Steve Riley posted another good article on a new scam that may find it&#8217;s way into your mailbox soon.&nbsp; Be prepared now&#8230;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Excerpt:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&#8220;Looks like spammers have found yet another way to worm (ha ha) themselves into the computers of the unsuspecting. In my junk email folder this morning, I saw this message:
<p>From: Question It [mailto:question_it@fanboxapps.com] <br />Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 2:34<br />To: Steve Riley<br />Subject: Ratul has asked you a question on FanBox
<p>&lt;link&gt;
<p>Ratul asked you a question. View the question &lt;big link here&gt; and answer it.
<p>FanBox.com is the web-based desktop that instantly turns every computer into your computer. It includes over 10,000 web applications and games to choose from, including the Question It application.
<p>This email was sent by Ratul while using the Question It application on FanBox. Go here &lt;another link&gt; to learn more or stop receiving emails from friends using Question It. FanBox: 255 G Street #723, San Diego, CA 92101, USA&#8221;
<p>&nbsp;
<p><a href="http://blogs.technet.com/steriley/archive/2008/01/07/faxbox-the-latest-in-password-scams.aspx">Read the rest of Steve&#8217;s post here&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/01/07/faxbox-the-latest-in-password-scams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Riley: What&#8217;s your data worth? More importantly, to whom?</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/26/steve-riley-whats-your-data-worth-more-importantly-to-whom/</link>
		<comments>http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/26/steve-riley-whats-your-data-worth-more-importantly-to-whom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/26/steve-riley-whats-your-data-worth-more-importantly-to-whom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the pleasure of watching Steve Riley speak a while back and his enthusiasm is contagious and he really knows how to drive home the point. Steve writes&#8230; &#8220;This week, I&#8217;m attending and spoke at a cybercrime conference in Singapore. One of the presenters made a very good point, and I want to share [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I had the pleasure of watching <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/steriley/default.aspx">Steve Riley</a> speak a while back and his enthusiasm is contagious and he really knows how to drive home the point.</p>
<p>Steve writes&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;This week, I&#8217;m attending and spoke at a cybercrime conference in Singapore. One of the presenters made a very good point, and I want to share it with you.</p>
<p><strong>When considering how to protect your data, don&#8217;t consider how valuable it might be to an attacker. Always, instead, consider how valuable it is to <em>you</em>.&#8221;</strong>
<p><strong><a href="http://blogs.technet.com/steriley/archive/2007/10/24/what-s-your-data-worth-more-importantly-to-whom.aspx">Read the rest of his post here&#8230;</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/26/steve-riley-whats-your-data-worth-more-importantly-to-whom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exchange Certificate Generator Utility</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/26/new-exchange-certificate-generator-utility/</link>
		<comments>http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/26/new-exchange-certificate-generator-utility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/26/new-exchange-certificate-generator-utility/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First brought to my attention by Elan Shudnow and created by DigiCert, this online utility is a must for any administrator deploying Exchange 2007, Exchange 2010 or any application (OCS) that requires Subject Alternative Names (SAN) certificates.  This utility adds a graphical interface to the New-ExchangeCertificate Powershell command.  Simply enter your information into the fields [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>First brought to my attention by <a href="http://www.shudnow.net/2007/10/22/new-exchangecertificate-command-generator/">Elan Shudnow</a> and created by <a href="http://">DigiCert</a>, this online utility is a must for any administrator deploying Exchange 2007, Exchange 2010 or any application (OCS) that requires Subject Alternative Names (SAN) certificates.  This utility adds a graphical interface to the New-ExchangeCertificate Powershell command.  Simply enter your information into the fields provided and the tool will automatically generate the required Powershell command.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.digicert.com/easy-csr/exchange2007.htm">Click here for the Exchange 2007 CSR tool&#8230;</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.digicert.com/easy-csr/exchange2010.htm" target="_blank">Click here for th</a><a href="https://www.digicert.com/easy-csr/exchange2010.htm" target="_blank">e Exchange 2010 CSR tool&#8230;</a></p>
<p><a href="http://aspoc.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/exchangecsrtool.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-881 alignnone" title="exchangecsrtool" src="http://aspoc.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/exchangecsrtool.png" alt="Exchange CSR Tool" width="572" height="296" /></a></p>
<h3>Other Useful Links</h3>
<p>U-B Tech&#8217;s <a href="http://www.u-btech.com/products/certificate-manager-for-exchange-2007.html" target="_blank">Certificate Manager for Exchange 2007</a> &#8211; A free, easy to use downloadable GUI that enabled you to&#8230;</p>
<ol>
<li>Manage your current server certificates.</li>
<li>Enable certificates for  Exchange 2007 Services (POP, IMAP, SMTP, IIS, UM).</li>
<li>Generate an Exchange  2007 Certificate Signing Request and process the Certificate Authority  answer.</li>
<li>Generate an Exchange 2007 Self-Signed certificate (not for  production use).</li>
<li>Easily include additional subject names in a single  certificate.</li>
<li>Import &amp; Export ability for existing certificates.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/26/new-exchange-certificate-generator-utility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visio 2007 Connector for Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer (MBSA) 2.1</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/16/visio-2007-connector-for-microsoft-baseline-security-analyzer-mbsa-21/</link>
		<comments>http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/16/visio-2007-connector-for-microsoft-baseline-security-analyzer-mbsa-21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Microsoft Office Visio 2007 Connector for Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer (MBSA) lets you view the results of an MBSA scan in a clear, comprehensive Microsoft Office Visio 2007 network diagram.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=95e0f821-9c2c-4287-9157-49c1205e08ef&amp;displaylang=en&amp;tm">Microsoft Office Visio 2007 Connector</a> for Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer (MBSA) lets you view the results of an MBSA scan in a clear, comprehensive Microsoft Office Visio 2007 network diagram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/16/visio-2007-connector-for-microsoft-baseline-security-analyzer-mbsa-21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
