<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for a Single Point of Contact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aspoc.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aspoc.net</link>
	<description>a technical blog, by Matt Wade</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:36:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unidentified Network issue with VMWare&#8217;s virtual NICs in Vista by Tomas</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/10/30/unidentified-network-issue-with-vmwares-virtual-nics-in-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-2637</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/10/30/unidentified-network-issue-with-vmwares-virtual-nics-in-vista/#comment-2637</guid>
		<description>same to me, Windows 7 64bit host. Also got it out of unidentified networks, but ports are still blocked (80,443,telnet...). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same to me, Windows 7 64bit host. Also got it out of unidentified networks, but ports are still blocked (80,443,telnet&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to add the Exchange Tabs and Tasks to the Active Directory Users and Computers snap-in without loading Exchange System Manager by moracca</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/13/how-to-add-the-exchange-tabs-and-tasks-to-the-active-directory-users-and-computers-snap-in-without-loading-exchange-system-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-2636</link>
		<dc:creator>moracca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/?p=3#comment-2636</guid>
		<description>thanks for this...  its really annoying to have to find the exchange cd and install the whole system management tools in order to manage email addresses from another server. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for this&#8230;  its really annoying to have to find the exchange cd and install the whole system management tools in order to manage email addresses from another server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unidentified Network issue with VMWare&#8217;s virtual NICs in Vista by Dennis</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/10/30/unidentified-network-issue-with-vmwares-virtual-nics-in-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-2635</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/10/30/unidentified-network-issue-with-vmwares-virtual-nics-in-vista/#comment-2635</guid>
		<description>On my Windows 7 64bit host, these steps took the VMware nic out of the public unidentified network, but it did not make it a home or office identified network. Any suggestions? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my Windows 7 64bit host, these steps took the VMware nic out of the public unidentified network, but it did not make it a home or office identified network. Any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reset Health doesn&#8217;t work in SCOM Health Explorer? by Sam John</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/13/reset-health-doesnt-work-in-scom-health-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-2633</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/?p=7#comment-2633</guid>
		<description>Should this procedure be done while in maintenance mode? 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should this procedure be done while in maintenance mode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dark Aurora Wallpaper by Matt_Wade</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/13/dark-aurora-wallpaper/comment-page-1/#comment-2632</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt_Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/?p=19#comment-2632</guid>
		<description>Added a high-res link for 1500x1125.  Enjoy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Added a high-res link for 1500&#215;1125.  Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dark Aurora Wallpaper by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2007/10/13/dark-aurora-wallpaper/comment-page-1/#comment-2631</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/?p=19#comment-2631</guid>
		<description>Wonderful Background, but it&#039;s only 640x480... I&#039;d use it if it was bigger, maybe 1024x768 or bigger. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful Background, but it&#039;s only 640&#215;480&#8230; I&#039;d use it if it was bigger, maybe 1024&#215;768 or bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to clear the AutoComplete list in Outlook 2010 by Matt_Wade</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2010/05/04/how-to-clear-the-autocomplete-list-in-outlook-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt_Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/archives/2010/05/04/how-to-clear-the-autocomplete-list-in-outlook-2010/#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>Yes, this still applies if your are running Outlook 2010 on Exchange 2007. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this still applies if your are running Outlook 2010 on Exchange 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to clear the AutoComplete list in Outlook 2010 by Judie Rahman</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2010/05/04/how-to-clear-the-autocomplete-list-in-outlook-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator>Judie Rahman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/archives/2010/05/04/how-to-clear-the-autocomplete-list-in-outlook-2010/#comment-2629</guid>
		<description>Matt - Great article!  Will this work if we are running Exchange server 2007? Or do we have to wait for 2010? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt &#8211; Great article!  Will this work if we are running Exchange server 2007? Or do we have to wait for 2010?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to clear the AutoComplete list in Outlook 2010 by Matt_Wade</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2010/05/04/how-to-clear-the-autocomplete-list-in-outlook-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-2628</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt_Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/archives/2010/05/04/how-to-clear-the-autocomplete-list-in-outlook-2010/#comment-2628</guid>
		<description>Apologize for the late reply.  No you will still not be able to manage the Autocomplete list centrally.  That would be a nice option for future versions of Exchange. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologize for the late reply.  No you will still not be able to manage the Autocomplete list centrally.  That would be a nice option for future versions of Exchange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WinSxS, Disk Space and Windows 7 by FBKK</title>
		<link>http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/11/20/winsxs-disk-space-and-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-2623</link>
		<dc:creator>FBKK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aspoc.net/archives/2008/11/20/winsxs-disk-space-and-windows-7/#comment-2623</guid>
		<description>Actually some of the files in the WinSxs Files are actually hardlinks to files in other locations, which means that if you add up the size of the WinSxS folder to other folders on C: and free space you will exceed your partition size, by my calculations on my C: drive I have some 2,5 GB of extra space on C, which means that at least 2,5 GB of reported disk space is made up of hardlinks to other files. That being said, my winsxs folder is about 7 GB in size, which means that at it contains about 4,5 GB of files which are not hardlinks, and this is not surprising if you know how the winsxs folder works, basically it stores every version of every shared dll on a system, and supposedly it deletes a version when the system is sure that there are no more applications using a particular version, however it is very difficult to determine when a shared dll is no longer in use, so more often than not, just to be sure, windows keep every version of every patch, update and fix dll in the winsxs folder, and on x64 system usually 2 version of every dll, the x86 and the x64 version, side by side as the folder name suggests. What you end up with is a bloated beast.  
Recently I find myself using Ubuntu more and more, and it&#039;s surprisingly nice, and I find myself able to do everything I would do in windows, except hardcore gaming and windows programming of course, and while OpenOffice is definitely not on par with MSOffice I think it would be usable in most office settings. So we still have 4 more years of WinXP support, and to me it remains to be seen if Linux will even be considered as an alternative, but it definitely should be. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually some of the files in the WinSxs Files are actually hardlinks to files in other locations, which means that if you add up the size of the WinSxS folder to other folders on C: and free space you will exceed your partition size, by my calculations on my C: drive I have some 2,5 GB of extra space on C, which means that at least 2,5 GB of reported disk space is made up of hardlinks to other files. That being said, my winsxs folder is about 7 GB in size, which means that at it contains about 4,5 GB of files which are not hardlinks, and this is not surprising if you know how the winsxs folder works, basically it stores every version of every shared dll on a system, and supposedly it deletes a version when the system is sure that there are no more applications using a particular version, however it is very difficult to determine when a shared dll is no longer in use, so more often than not, just to be sure, windows keep every version of every patch, update and fix dll in the winsxs folder, and on x64 system usually 2 version of every dll, the x86 and the x64 version, side by side as the folder name suggests. What you end up with is a bloated beast.<br />
Recently I find myself using Ubuntu more and more, and it&#039;s surprisingly nice, and I find myself able to do everything I would do in windows, except hardcore gaming and windows programming of course, and while OpenOffice is definitely not on par with MSOffice I think it would be usable in most office settings. So we still have 4 more years of WinXP support, and to me it remains to be seen if Linux will even be considered as an alternative, but it definitely should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.393 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-07-29 18:12:01 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->